Tire Tread Resins & RPOs 2021

Key Features:

Comprehensive Executive Summary with Practical Findings and Key Takeaways

Global & Regional Analysis Covering the Years 2015 to 2050

Quantitative TPR and RPO Market Drivers

Qualitative TPR and RPO Markt Drivers

TPR and RPO Manufacturing Landscapes

TPR and RPO developments & Related Tire Patent/Brand Analysis

Market Demand by Current and Tire Manufacturers' Vision Scenarios

Market Demand 2015 to 2050 by Region and TPR/RPO Type

Market Pricing for 2017 to 2020 by TPR/RPO Type

Market Values 2020 projected to 2030/40/50

Supporting Data in Excel Workbook

Client Support

Details

List Price: £5000
Published: August 2021
Edition: 2nd Edition
140 Pages, 146 Tables, 36 Figures

Target Audience:

This report is targeted at rubber chemical manufacturers and tire manufacturers. Rubber chemical manufacturers include resin (tread additives), rubber process oil, and sustainable material manufacturers. The content is suitable for marketing strategies, market research and market insight. Other parties which will find this report valuable include: consultants, analysts and investors.

Exclusive Content:

Detailed quantitative tire market and manufacturing analysis.

Key Quantitative TPR and RPO Market Drivers

Key Qualitative TPR and RPO Market Drivers

TPR and RPO Market Demand 2015 to 2050 by:

Introductory Video

For further information please contact us by Email.

Detailed Description

Tire tread performance resin (TPR) and rubber process oil (RPO) market analysis for the period 2015 to 2050 covering global and regional market demand, pricing and value.

TPR and RPO market prospects are inter-related due to changing tire technologies driven by sustainability and automotive market developments. This report details the market drivers and explores the outcomes for both TPR and RPO looking at current/short-term trends and also the longer term impact of tire company sustainability visions and aspirations.

The report is based upon a combination of primary and secondary research combined with RCCL’s proprietary market modelling systems and wide ranging experience in rubber segment market analysis. RCCL aims to provide transparency for all market analysis and industry reports. Assumptions, methodology and key inputs are clearly explained and documented. Purchasers of this report can arrange to run reports using their preferred input variables, this can be done at a reduced daily consultation rate.

The report details the TPR and RPO manufacturing landscapes covering key manufacturers and product offerings. This is followed by a detailed quantitative look at the tire market looking at tire types and sub types, growth patterns and market trends. With a firm understanding of the tire market, focus in transferred to specific tire industry drivers relating to TPRs and RPOs. Tire industry drivers influencing the use of TPRs and RPOs cover high value added tire types, segmental positioning, geographical influences and external drivers.

The primary focus of the report is to generate meaningful and robust market demand and value estimates. The report provides comprehensive coverage of TPR and RPO market demand broken down by region, and TPR/RPO type. Market values are provided based upon average regional pricing.

Long term TPR/RPO demand is modelled using drivers from tire manufacturer's sustainability 'visions' stretching out to 2050. RCCL has applied estimated fossil material reductions based on tire manufacturer targets and ease of development for underlying tire types.

The comprehensive executive summary provides concise, practical key takeaways and conclusions which can be easily transferred to management presentations. This is complimented by the accompanying client data Excel workbook with summary data.

Methodology

Rubber Chemical Consultant Ltd.’s (RCCL) reports are compiled by a tire and rubber industry expert with 30+ year’s industry experience including market reporting for tire, rubber goods and rubber chemical sectors since 2009.

Reports are based on a mix of primary and secondary research utilising a wide range of bespoke market intelligence tools centred around the Global Tire and Rubber Chemical Database© (GTRCDB© ). The GTRCDB© is a sophisticated SQL database used to capture and monitor rubber chemical and rubber goods (Tire & MRG) production, technology and market drivers. This system ensures all pieces of information are captured and managed in a controlled manner. This provides significant levels of synergy between projects which allows cross-checks and improved reporting accuracy.

Primary research is from multiple confidential contacts covering technical, marketing and production functions in rubber chemical/tire/MRG companies. Primary research is complimented by extensive secondary research from multiple sources including: conferences, trade journals, industry associations, financial reports, company websites, patent literature, government sites and more. All information is managed through the GTRCDB©.

Information is validated and benchmarked wherever possible using direct market data, alternative market assessments and/or independent bespoke market modelling. Direct market data includes use patterns from confidential industry sources. Alternative market assessments use independent assessments from financial reporting. Independent market modelling includes detailed top-down automotive modelling for OE and replacement tire and rubber components.

RCCL’s continuous monitoring of industry trends and drivers allows regular market updates and responsive client based bespoke reporting. Our industry knowledge is a key ingredient for successful reporting. This provides a quick start to projects and insightful analysis as well as critical sanity checks for data.

Additional Content Information

Report ScopeReport ContentsTables and FiguresCompanies Mentioned

This market report has the following scope:

Market Segment: Tire segment focusing on TPRs and RPOs used to enhance the performance of tread compounds, specifically traction, handling, rolling resistance and wear for the Products below.

Tread Performance Resin (TPR): Resin used to enhance the end performance of a tread compound. This excludes tack resins. Examples and categorisation are provided in the download documents (sample and contents).

Rubber Process Oil (RPO): Oils used to enhance the processability and end performance of a tread compound. Examples and categorisation are provided in the download documents (sample and contents).

Products: Car, SUV, LT, Motorcycle and Scooter tires and associated subtypes.

Geographies: Global coverage split by RCCL defined regions: Africa, China, CIS, Europe, India, Middle East, North America, North Asia, South America and South Asia.

Time Frame: Market demand for years 2015 to 2050. Market pricing for APAC, EMEA, USMCA for 2017 to 2020. Market values for 2020/30/40/50.

Report Contents

This report also includes a client Excel Workbook with chart and table data.

1. Contents

2. Executive Summary (10 Pages)

Scope
Objectives
Market Drivers
1. Quantitative
2. Qualitative
Market Demand
1. TPRs
2. RPOs
Market Price & Market Values
1. TPRS
2. RPOs
Industry Outlook
1. Tire Industry
2. TPR Industry
3. RPO Industry

3. Introduction (6 Pages)

Definitions, Abbreviations & Nomenclature
Scope
Objectives
Information Sources
Assumptions

4. TPR Manufacturing Landscape (10 Pages)

Industry Overview
Raw Materials
Resin Types
Key Manufacturers
1. Financial Performance
2. Arakawa
3. Cheeshine Chemicals
4. Cray Valley (Total)
5. DRT
6. Eastman Chemical Company
7. Evonik
8. ENEOS
9. ExxonMobil
10. Kolon Industries
11. Kraton Corporation
12. Kuraray
13. Rutgers Novares
14. Yasuhara Chemical
15. Zeon Corporation
16. Other Manufacturers
17. Key TPR Resin Manufacturing Trends
TPR Industry Developments

5. RPO Manufacturing Landscape (5 Pages)

Industry Overview
Raw Materials and RPO Types
Key Manufacturers
RPO Industry Developments

6. Quantitative Tire Market Drivers(7 Pages)

Tire Types
1. PC and SUV
  1. Standard Tires (S, T rated)
  2. High Performance Tires (H, V rated)
  3. Ultra-High Performance Tires (W+ rated)
  4. Specialist Variants: Winter and All Weather
2. Motorcycle and Scooter
3. Light Truck
Changing Vehicle Technologies (Drivetrain)

7. Qualitative Tire Market Drivers(31 Pages)

Tire Technology
1. Historical Perspecitive
2. Evolution of High Value Added Products
  1. PC and SUV
  2. Motorcycle and Scooter
3. Market Positioning
  1. Manufacturer's Tier Level
  2. Original Equipment Market
  3. Replacement Market
4. Geographical Influences
  1. Performance Requirements
  2. Compounding Differences
5. Compounding Requirements for TPRs
6. Compounding Requirements for RPOs
External Drivers
1. Tire Labelling
2. Sustainable Developments
Competing Technologies
TPR Technology Developments
1. TPR Manufacturer Developments
2. TPR Tire Related Patent Review
3. TPR Tire Brand Analysis
RPO Technology Developments
1. RPO Manufacturer Developments
2. RPO Tire Related Patent Review
3. RPO Tire Brand Analysis

8. Market Demand 2015 to 2050 (22 Pages)

TPRs
1. Total Demand All Types
  1. Global Demand
  2. Regional Demand
2. Demand By TPR Type
  1. Global Demand
  2. Regional Demand
RPOs
1. Total Demand All Types
  1. Global Demand
  2. Regional Demand
2. Demand By TPR Type
  1. Global Demand
  2. Regional Demand

9. Market Prices & Market Values (24 Pages)

Market Prices
1. TPRs by Region
  1. APAC
  2. Europe
  3. USMCA
2. RPOs by Region
  1. APAC
  2. Europe
  3. USMCA
Market Values
1. TPRs
  1. All Types
  2. Individual Types
2. RPOs
  1. All Types
  2. Individual Types

10. Concluding Remarks (4 Pages)

Key Top Level Findings
Future Considerations
Extended Client Analysis

11. Appendices (11 Pages)

Methodology
Data Validation
Market Segmentation and Sub Segments

12. Additional Documentation

Report Tables

Section 2 - Executive Summary

Table 2.1 - TPR Categorisation & Examples
Table 2.2 - Tire Tread RPO Categorisation and Examples
Table 2.3 - Global TPR Market Demand All Types by Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 2.4 - Global RPO Market Demand for All Types by Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 2.5 – TPR Average 2019 and 2020 Delivered Regional Pricing by Type, $/MT
Table 2.6 - Global Market Value for All TPR Types by Scenario 2020/30/40/50
Table 2.7 - Regional TPR Market Value for All TPR Types by Scenario 2020/30/40/50
Table 2.8 - RPO Average 2020 Regional Delivered Pricing by Type, $/MT
Table 2.9 - Global Market Value for All RPO Types by Scenario 2020/30/40/50
Table 2.10 - Regional Market Value for All RPO Types by Scenario 2020/30/40/50

Section 3 - Introduction

Table 3.1 - Definitions, Abbreviations and Nomenclature (A to H)
Table 3.2 - Definitions, Abbreviations and Nomenclature (I to S)
Table 3.3 - Definitions, Abbreviations and Nomenclature (T to Z)
Table 3.4 - Tire Tread Performance Resin Categorisation & Examples
Table 3.5 - Tire Tread RPO Categorisation and Examples

Section 4 - TPR Manufacturing Landscape

Table 4.1 - Arakawa's TPR Products
Table 4.2 - Cheeshine Chemical's TPR Products
Table 4.3 - Cray Valley's TPR Products
Table 4.4 - DRT's TPR Products
Table 4.5 - Eastman's TPR Products
Table 4.6 - ENEOS' TPR Products
Table 4.7 - Evonik's TPR Products
Table 4.8 - ExxonMobil's TPR Products
Table 4.9 - Kolon Industries' TPR Products
Table 4.10 - Kraton's TPR Products
Table 4.11 - Kuraray's TPR Products
Table 4.12 - Rutger Novares' TPR Products
Table 4.13 - Yasuhara Chemical's TPR Products
Table 4.14 - Zeon Corporation's TPR Products

Section 5 - RPO Manufacturer Landscape

Table 5.1 - Key Manufacturers in APAC, CIS and Europe
Table 5.2 - Key Manufacturers in M. East, USMCA and LATAM

Section 6 - Quantitative Tire Market Drivers

Table 6.1 – PC and SUV Standard Tire Unit Evolution 2015 to 2040
Table 6.2 - Motorcycle Radial Tire Unit Evolution 2015 to 2040

Section 7 - Qualitative Tire Market Drivers

Table 7.1 - Manufacturer's Tier Level
Table 7.2 - Tire Company Sustainable Targets (Most Recent Publication)
Table 7.3 - Top Tier Manufacturers' Eco Labelled Tire Examples (non-exhaustive)
Table 7.4 - Tire Performance Abbreviations for Patent Activity
Table 7.5 - TPR Abbreviations for Patent Activity
Table 7.6 - Bridgestone TPR Related Patents
Table 7.7 - Continental's TPR Related Patents
Table 7.8 - Goodyear's TPR Related Patents
Table 7.9 - Hankook's TPR Related Patents
Table 7.10 - Kumho's TPR Related Patents
Table 7.11 - Michelin's TPR Related Patents
Table 7.12 - Pirelli's TPR Related Patents
Table 7.13 - Sumitomo's TPR Related Patents
Table 7.14 - Toyo's TPR Related Patents
Table 7.15 - Yokohama's TPR Related Patents
Table 7.16 - Resins Mentioned by Tire Company Patents (Non-exhaustive)
Table 7.17 - Bridgestone's TPR Related Brands
Table 7.18 - Continental's TPR Related Brands
Table 7.19 - Goodyear's TPR Related Brands
Table 7.20 - Hankook's TPR Related Brands
Table 7.21 - Kumho's TPR Related Brands
Table 7.22 - Michelin's TPR Related Brands
Table 7.23 - Pirelli's TPR Related Brands
Table 7.24 - Sumitomo's TPR Related Brands
Table 7.25 - Toyo's TPR Related Brands
Table 7.26 - Yokohama's TPR Related Brands
Table 7.27 - RPO Abbreviations for Patent Activity
Table 7.28 - Bridgestone RPO Related Patents
Table 7.29 - Continental's RPO Related Patents
Table 7.30 - Goodyear's RPO Related Patents
Table 7.31 - Hankook's RPO Related Patents
Table 7.32 - Kumho's RPO Related Patents
Table 7.33 - Michelin's RPO Related Patents
Table 7.34 - Pirelli's RPO Related Patents
Table 7.35 - Sumitomo's RPO Related Patents
Table 7.36 - Toyo's RPO Related Patents
Table 7.37 - Yokohama's RPO Related Patents
Table 7.38 - Continental's RPO Related Brands
Table 7.39 - Goodyear's RPO Related Brands
Table 7.40 - Hankook's RPO Related Brands
Table 7.41 - Kumho's RPO Related Brands
Table 7.42 - Michelin's RPO Related Brands
Table 7.43 - Pirelli's RPO Related Brands
Table 7.44 - Sumitomo's RPO Related Brands
Table 7.45 - Toyo's ROI Related Brands

Section 8 - Market Demand 2015 to 2050

Table 8.1 - Reduction in Fossil Content based on Tire Company’s Aspirations
Table 8.2 - Global Market Demand All TPR Types by Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.3 - Regional Market Demand All TPR Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.4 - Regional Market Demand All TPR Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.5 - Global Market Demand by TPR Type using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.6 - Global Market Demand by TPR Type using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.7 - Regional Market Demand for AMS Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.8 - Regional Market Demand for AMS Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.9 - Regional Market Demand for C5 Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.10 - Regional Market Demand for C5 Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.11 - Regional Market Demand for C5C9 Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.12 - Regional Market Demand for C5C9 Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.13 - Regional Market Demand for C9 Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.14 - Regional Market Demand for C9 Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.15 - Regional Market Demand for H-DCPD Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.16 - Regional Market Demand for H-DCPD Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.17 - Regional Market Demand for LP Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.18 - Regional Market Demand for LP STY Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.19 - Regional Market Demand for LP STY Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.20 - Regional Market Demand for TP Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.21 - Total Market Demand for All Types by Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.22 - Regional Market Demand for All RPO Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.23 - Regional Market Demand for All RPO Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.24 - Global Market Demand by RPO Type using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.25 - Global Market Demand by RPO Type using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.26 - Regional Market Demand for DAE Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.27 - Regional Market Demand for DAE Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.28 - Regional Market Demand for MES Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.29 - Regional Market Demand for MES Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.30 - Regional Market Demand for HN Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.31 - Regional Market Demand for HN Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.32 - Regional Market Demand for PAR Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.33 - Regional Market Demand for PAR Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.34 - Regional Market Demand for RAE Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.35 - Regional Market Demand for RAE Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.36 - Regional Market Demand for TDAE Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.37 - Regional Market Demand for TDAE Types using Vision Scenario 2015 to 2050
Table 8.38 - Regional Market Demand for VO Types using Current Scenario 2015 to 2050

Section 9 - Market Prices and Values

Table 9.1 - Average 2017 to 2020 Prices by TPR Type for APAC
Table 9.2 - Average 2017 to 2020 Prices by TPR for EMEA
Table 9.3 - Average 2017 to 2020 Prices by TPR Type for USMCA
Table 9.4 - Average 2017 to 2020 Prices by RPO Type for APAC
Table 9.5 - Average 2017 to 2020 Prices by RPO Type for EMEA
Table 9.6 - Average 2017 to 2020 Prices by RPO Type for USMCA
Table 9.7 - Global Market Value All TPR Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.8 - Regional Market Value All TPR Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.9 – Global Market Value by TPR Type 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.10 - Regional Market Value for AMS Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.11 - Regional Market Value for C5 Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.12 - Regional Market Value for C9 Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.13 - Regional Market Value for C5C9 Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.14 - Regional Market Value for H-DCPD Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.15 - Regional Market Value for TP Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.16 - Regional Market Value for LP Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.17 - Reginal Market Value for LP STY Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.18 - Global Market Value for All RPO Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.19 - Regional Market Value for All RPO Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.20 - Global Market Value by RPO Type 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.21 - Regional Market Value for DAE Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.22 - Regional Market Value for TDAE Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.23 - Regional Market Value for HN Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.24 - Regional Market Value for MES Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.25 - Regional Market Value for PAR Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.26 - Regional Market Value for RAE Types 2020/30/40/50
Table 9.27 - Regional Market Value for VO Types 2020/30/40/50

Sectio 11 - Appendices

Table 11.1- Future Year Projections
Table 11.2 - Tire Parameters
Table 11.3 – Tire Types and Subtypes

Report Figures

Section 2 - Excecutive Summary

Figure 2.1 - PC + SUV Regional Tire Production Growth 2015 to 2040
Figure 2.2 - PC and SUV Tire Production Growth by Subtype 2015 to 2040
Figure 2.3 - Global TPR Market Demand by Type and Scenario 2015 to 2050
Figure 2.4 - Global RPO Market Demand by Type and Scenario 2015 to 2050
Figure 2.5 - Vision Scenario Change from 2021 Market Demand by RPO Type to 2050

Section 4 - TPR Manufacturing Landscape

Figure 4.1 - Simplified Schematic for Raw Material to Resin Type
Figure 4.2 - EBIT/Sales Revenue for Selected TPR Manufacturers & Business Segments 2015 to 2021
Figure 4.3 - Kraton Corporation's Chemical Segment Financials 2016 to 2021
Figure 4.4 - RCCL Estimates for Kraton TPR Sales & Volumes

Section 5 - RPO Manufacturing Landscape

Figure 5.1 - Lube Base Oil Production and RPO Streams
Figure 5.2 - API Base Oil Categorisation

Section 6 - Quantitative Tire Market Drivers

Figure 6.1 - Tire Unit Evolution by Region All Tire Types 2015 to 2040
Figure 6.2 - Tire Unit Evolution by Tire Type 2015 to 2040
Figure 6.3 - PC and SUV Tire Unit Evolution 2015 to 2040
Figure 6.4 – PC and SUV HP AS Tire Unit Evolution 2015 to 2040
Figure 6.5 - PC and SUV HP SM Tire Unit Evolution 2015 to 2040
Figure 6.6 - PC and SUV UHP AS Tire Unit Evolution 2015 to 2040
Figure 6.7 - PC and SUV UHP SM Tire Unit Evolution 2015 to 2040
Figure 6.8 - PC and SUV WT and AW Tire Unit Evolution 2015 to 2040
Figure 6.9 - Motorcycle and Scooter Tire Unit Evolution 2015 to 2040
Figure 6.10 - Light Truck Sub Type Unit Evolution 2015 to 2040
Figure 6.11 – PC and SUV OE Tire Demand by Vehicle Drivetrain 2011 to 2040, millions
Figure 6.12 – PC and SUV RP Tire Demand by Vehicle Drivetrain 2011 to 2040, millions

Section 7 - Qualitative Tire Market Drivers

Figure 7.1 - PC and SUV Subtype Differentiation Overview
Figure 7.2 - Tire Labelling Status by Region

Section 10 - Concluding Remarks

Figure 10.1 - PC + SUV Tire Production Growth 2015 to 2040
Figure 10.2 - PC vs SUV Tire Production by Subtype 2015 to 2040
Figure 10.3 - TPR Current Scenario Change from 2021 Market Demand
Figure 10.4 - TPR Vision Scenario Change from 2021 Market Demand
Figure 10.5 - RPO Current Scenario Change from 2021 Market Demand
Figure 10.6 - RPO Vision Scenario Change from 2021 Market Demand

Section 11 - Appendices

Figure 11.1- 'Consumer-Up' Market Analysis
Figure 11.2- Consumer Plant Parameters
Figure 11.3 - Product Technology Parameters
Figure 11.4- Market Utilisation Parameters
Figure 11.5 - Extended Model for Tire Segment

Companies Mentioned

Tire Performance Resin Manufacturers

Arakawa
Cheeshine Chemicals Co., Ltd
Cray Valley (Total)
DRT
Eastman Chemical Company
ENEOS
Evonik
ExxonMobil
Kolon Industries
Kraton Corporation
Kuraray
Rutgers Novares GmbH
Yasuhara Chemical
Zeon Corporation
Others: Daelim, Mitsui Chemicals, Sadara Chemicals, Songwon, Ube, Orgkhim

Rubber Process Oil Manufacturers

ATDM
Apar Industries
Cargill
Chevron Phillips
CNOOC
Cross Oil
Eni
Ergon
ExxonMobil
Gazprom
GP Petroleums
H&R Group
Hollyfrontier
Imperial Oil
IRPC
Kelpen
LyondellBasell
Nynas
Orlen Unipetrol
Orgkhim
Panamaa Petrochem
Performance Additives
Pertamina
Petrobras
PetroChina
Raj Petro Specialities
Repsol
Saipol
Shell
Suzhou Jiutai
Thai Lube Base
Total

Tire Companies

Bridgestone
Michelin
Goodyear
Continental
Pirelli
Yokohama
Toyo
Hankook
Kumho
Sumitomo

For further information please contact us by Email.

Rubber Chemical Consultants Ltd	UK Registered Company: 6863349	VAT No: 976 5004 04
Site © Rubber Chemical Consultants Ltd 2023
The statements, opinions and/or recommendations contained on this website are based on information believed to be reliable. However, Rubber Chemical Consultants Ltd makes no warranty or guarantee of accuracy or completeness in connection therewith, nor, with respect to any proposed application or course of action.